Different enquiries need different context. Rather than route everything through one address, we have separated the four kinds of approach we receive most often, so your message is read with the right context and answered directly. Each route states how quickly you can expect a reply.
Regulators, ministries, standards bodies, universities and companies seeking formal engagement — partnership proposals, requests for evidence, or an approach about embedding review processes in your own governance.
[email protected] Reviewed weekly. Substantive proposals receive a considered reply rather than an acknowledgement.Academic and independent researchers proposing collaborations, submitting work for our publication programme, requesting peer review, or asking about data and methods behind anything we have published.
[email protected] Read directly by our founder. Requests for our underlying data and methods are answered as a matter of policy.Journalists seeking comment, background briefing or technical explanation. Please state your outlet, your question and your deadline; deadline-driven requests are treated as urgent.
[email protected] Monitored daily on working days. If we cannot help within your deadline we will tell you immediately rather than leave you waiting.Funders, philanthropic institutions and prospective strategic partners. Our funding conditions — no review rights over findings, no restriction on publication, full public disclosure — are shared in full before any conversation about amounts.
[email protected] Handled directly by our founder.If none of the four routes above fits, write to us here. Every message is currently read personally by our founder, and we would rather answer fewer messages properly than acknowledge all of them automatically, so a considered reply may take a little longer than an automated one would.
Ethical Infrastructure
Rome, Italy
Read on working days. Substantive enquiries receive a considered reply rather than an acknowledgement.